"English Revolution"
has been used to describe two different events in English history.
The first to be so called—by Whig historians—was
the Glorious Revolution of 1688, whereby James II was
replaced by William III and Mary II as
monarch and a constitutional monarchy was established.[1]
In the twentieth-century,
however, Marxist historians introduced the use of the
term "English Revolution" to describe the period of the English Civil
Wars and Commonwealthperiod (1640–1660), in which
Parliament challenged King Charles I's authority, engaged in civil
conflict against his forces, and executed him in 1649. This was followed by a
ten-year period of bourgeois republican government, the
"Commonwealth", before monarchy was restored in the shape of Charles'
son, Charles II in 1660.
In The
Glorious Revolution of 1688, James II was replaced by William III and Mary II
as monarch and a constitutional monarchy was established and was described by
Whig historians as the English Revolution.[1] This interpretation suggests that the
"English Revolution" was the final act in the long process of reform
and consolidation by Parliament to achieve a balanced constitutional monarchy
in Britain, and laws were made that pointed towards freedom In The Glorious
Revolution of 1688, James II was replaced by William III and Mary II as monarch
and a constitutional monarchy was established and was described by Whig
historians as the English Revolution.[1] This interpretation suggests that the
"English Revolution" was the final act in the long process of reform
and consolidation by Parliament to achieve a balanced constitutional monarchy
in Britain, and laws were made that pointed towards freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment